Midland Dam Flood Victims Can Seek Compensation After Sommers Schwartz Gets a Victory in the Michigan Court of Appeals

Midland Dam Flood Victims Can Seek Compensation After Sommers Schwartz Gets a Victory in the Michigan Court of Appeals


Detroit, Michigan – In 2020, Michigan’s hydropower dams, teetering on the brink due to neglect, culminated in disaster. The dam owners’ failure to maintain operating standards led to the State of Michigan’s intervention. Ignoring clear signs of the dam’s vulnerability, the state chose to keep water levels perilously high. This decision backfired spectacularly when a major storm led to a massive flood, decimating the scenic beauty of Wixom Lake and resulting in immense property damage.

Sommers Schwartz, under the leadership of partner Jason J. Thompson, stood at the forefront of the legal battle as a champion for the rights of the Midland dam flood victims.

Many aggrieved parties, from homeowners to businesses, sought justice based on “inverse condemnation”—a principle asserting that significant property damage by government actions equates to forced property acquisition without fair remuneration.

Despite the State of Michigan’s attempts to dismiss the claim based on the perceived irrelevance of inverse condemnation, the trial court remained unconvinced, prompting an appeal.

In the appellate court, David R. Parker of Sommers Schwartz articulated the state’s complicity in the disaster, underscoring choices like maintaining high water levels before the flood and disseminating misleading information about the dam’s status.

The Court of Appeals, drawing parallels with the Flint Water Crises, validated the plaintiffs’ arguments. As the State had been found accountable in the Flint case for exposing citizens to polluted water, here too, the State’s proactive role in the flooding debacle was acknowledged.

The debate on whether the State’s actions served a “public use” took center stage. Typically associated with state-led property acquisitions, the term was expansively interpreted. The State’s endeavor to sustain specific environmental conditions, despite jeopardizing human safety and assets, signaled a public use motive. Echoing this view, the Court ruled the state’s endeavors did represent public use, necessitating appropriate compensation for the aggrieved.

This groundbreaking verdict not only clears the path for remuneration for those affected by the Midland dam flood but also showcases the perseverance of Sommers Schwartz’s attorneys, particularly Mr. Thompson and Mr. Parker, in championing justice.

“It is unsettling when your own government harms you. But when they get caught, and they hire lawyers to try and avoid accountability, that is infuriating. Last week the Court of Appeals rejected the State’s attempt to run from what they did. We won’t stop until the State takes responsibility for what they did to their own citizens,” said attorney Jason J. Thompson.

Homeowners, businesses, and renters who suffered losses from the Midland dam flood are encouraged to contact Sommers Schwartz at (248) 355-0300 or visit https://sommerspc.com.


Kriegler v Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy and Department of Natural Resources
Court of Appeals of Michigan
No. 359895.

Forbes v Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy
Court of Appeals of Michigan
No. 359897

Sommers Schwartz is a powerhouse litigation firm made up of experienced personal injury lawyers, medical malpractice attorneys, commercial and business law attorneys, and employee rights lawyers fighting for unpaid wages and overtime. The law firm serves clients across the country from its offices in Michigan and California.

Sommers Schwartz, P.C.
1 Towne Square #1700
Southfield, MI 48076
(248) 355-0300
Press Contact : Media Contact

Distributed by Law Firm Newswire 

This story is published through a partnership with Law Firm Newswire. The editorial staff of Bigger Law Firm Magazine did not contribute to this article. The views expressed are solely those of the source of the news release and do not reflect the views of Law Firm Newswire or Bigger Law Firm Magazine. Questions related to this story should be directed to the media contact referenced in the article. 

Law Firm Newswire


Lawyers used ChatGPT

Lawyers in New York Used ChatGPT and Now Face Possible Sanctions

Several lawyers are under scrutiny and face potential sanctions after utilizing OpenAI’s advanced language model, ChatGPT, for the drafting of legal documents submitted in a New York federal court. The attention surrounding this matter stems from the erroneous citation of non-existent or irrelevant cases by ChatGPT. The adoption of AI in legal practice is not…

Google Changes the Rules for AI Content

Google has Changed their Mind About AI Generated Content

Their change in terms essentially amounts to, “Yes, you can use AI tools to help create quality content but it had better be good.”

Law Firm Marketing Director

What Makes a Great Law Firm Marketing Director?

In an ever-changing legal landscape, an exceptional Law Firm Marketing Director stays ahead of the curve. They adopt a visionary perspective to navigate through intricate legal landscapes and drive the firm’s marketing initiatives. This involves identifying market trends, predicting client needs, and planning innovative marketing strategies to secure a competitive edge.