Share.

In lieu of the new Pennsylvania congressional district map, there has been tension from Republicans as they have fought to stop it. Both the federal District Court and the U.S. Supreme Court rejected Republican requests of blocking the map.

Twelve Republican Pennsylvania lawmakers filed legislation on March 20 to impeach the Democratic state Supreme Court justices who ruled the previous congressional map to be unconstitutional by gerrymandering and consequently rewrote it.

The legislation comes a month after state Rep. Cris Dush called for impeachment of the Democratic justices. Two Republican pleas to the U.S. Supreme Court along with a federal lawsuit -- all unsuccessful.

When asked in an interview about the impeachment being vengeance against the Democrats, Dush contradicted the claim.

“It’s specifically to do what I’ve been sworn to do, which is protect and defend the constitutions of Pennsylvania and the United States, period. The Supreme Court overstepped its bounds, and the check-and-balance to that is impeachment and impeachment only. We have no other method to hold them accountable,” Dush explained.

However, the house Republican Leader Dave Reed released a statement indicating that the Republican proposal would not get far. The new state map will likely culminate in Democrats receiving more seats.

In 2011, Republicans controlled the redistricting process. Consequently they drew the Pennsylvania congressional map that favored their party, ending up in a 13-5 congressional district upper hand. This occurred even though the Democrats won five presidential elections in a row by that year.

To receive the majority in the U.S. House, Democrats must win a total of 24 seats.

It is possible that the Republican challenge against the new map will give way to more state court challenges across the United States.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to take up a Republican challenge to the newly drawn Pennsylvania congressional map ahead of the 2018 elections. The decision means Republicans have few, if any, options remaining.

Republican State House Speaker Mike Turzai, one of the legislative leaders who appealed to the Supreme Court, said that he still thinks the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overstepped its bounds when it imposed the new map .

"Nonetheless, we respect the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court and are prepared to move on to other issues of importance to the people of Pennsylvania," he said.

While the Republicans are disappointed about the courts’ decisions, Democrats are elated with wishes of gaining jurisdiction of the House.

“For anyone who cares about democracy, for anyone who cares that every voter’s voice should be heard, this is a great day,” said Mimi McKenzie, the legal director of the Public Interest Law Center.

About Author

Hannah Felfe is a staff contributor for Bigger Law Firm Magazine.

Promote your content effectively

Download the Latest Bigger Law Firm Magazine, FREE!

Want to download the full issue of Bigger Law Firm Magazine? Signup for This Week on BLF and you will receive a download link for our latest issue. 

Thank you for signing up for This Week on BLF! Download the latest issue at http://blfmag.com/BLFMag50

More in Government
Cryptocurrency Under Federal Securities Law
The Future of Cryptocurrency Under Regulations

On March 7, a U.S. district judge determined that cryptocurrencies can now be supervised by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. However, the CFTC will...

Close